Israel Government Moves to Investigate October 7 Attack, Shut Down Army Radio
The Israeli government is set to advance two controversial measures on October 9, 2023, aimed at addressing the events surrounding the October 7 Hamas attack and the future of Army Radio. The Ministerial Committee for Legislation will deliberate on a proposed inquiry into the attack, while the cabinet will consider the closure of the military-run radio station.
The proposed inquiry, spearheaded by Likud Member of Knesset (MK) Ariel Kallner, seeks to establish a committee that will investigate the circumstances of the attack. Unlike traditional state commissions, this committee would be formed by the Knesset and the government, circumventing the typical involvement of the Supreme Court. The committee is expected to consist of six members, equally divided between the coalition and opposition, along with four representatives from bereaved families to provide oversight.
Supporters of the Kallner bill argue that this approach allows for a balanced representation that does not rely on the judicial system, potentially fostering public trust. The proposed mechanism for member selection includes provisions for resolving disputes. If the Knesset fails to agree on committee members or a chair within a specified timeframe, each political bloc could appoint its own representatives. In such a scenario, the bill permits the appointment of two co-chairs if consensus on a single chair is not reached.
Opponents, including various political figures and advocacy groups, contend that this structure risks politicizing the inquiry. They argue that bypassing an independent state commission could undermine the legitimacy of the findings. Critics emphasize the need for a thorough investigation conducted by an impartial body, warning that a committee perceived as political might struggle to uncover the truth.
In addition to the inquiry, the cabinet will also vote on a proposal to close Army Radio, a move led by Defense Minister Israel Katz. The plan aims to implement the closure in phases, starting with the formation of a professional team to evaluate the implications for employees and explore alternatives for the station’s music programming, Galgalatz. Proponents of the closure assert that a military-run outlet should not engage in broadcasting political content, suggesting that this change would reinforce the IDF’s nonpolitical role.
Conversely, critics of the closure highlight potential threats to press freedom and a reduction in democratic discourse. They point to the station’s historical role in providing editorial independence and warn that a government decision to close it without comprehensive legislation may face legal challenges and provoke petitions to the High Court of Justice.
The simultaneous push for an inquiry into the October 7 events and the proposed closure of Army Radio underscores a politically charged week for Israel. The outcome of these measures could significantly impact both the public’s demand for accountability regarding the attack and the landscape of Israeli media. As the government navigates these contentious issues, the balance of executive power remains under scrutiny.
