Top Stories

Trump Reverses Course on Footage of Controversial Missile Strike

Trump Reverses Course on Footage of Controversial Missile Strike
Editorial
  • PublishedDecember 8, 2025

UPDATE: President Donald Trump has made a surprising reversal regarding the release of video footage from a controversial U.S. military missile strike in the Caribbean Sea that killed at least nine people on September 2. In a briefing earlier today, Trump claimed that two suspected drug smugglers were attempting to right their capsized boat when a second missile was fired. This admission raises serious questions about the legality and ethics of the military operation.

The President’s comments come as pressure mounts from Democratic lawmakers demanding the Pentagon release the unedited footage of the incident. Just last week, Trump indicated he had “no problem” with releasing the footage, but today he deferred the decision to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, stating, “Whatever Pete Hegseth wants to do is OK with me.” This shift in stance has sparked outrage and confusion, as it contradicts his earlier openness.

Trump defended the military’s actions, asserting that the operation was crucial to combat drug trafficking, which he claims poses a significant threat to the U.S. He stated, “They were trying to return the boat back to where it could float, and we didn’t want to see that because that boat was loaded up with drugs.” However, the Pentagon has not confirmed Trump’s assertions regarding the actions of the survivors aboard the vessel.

The September 2 operation marks the beginning of an ongoing U.S. campaign against drug smugglers in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, with 87 people reportedly killed across 22 strikes to date. Lawmakers are now threatening to withhold a quarter of Hegseth’s travel budget if the footage is not made available, as part of a larger $900 billion defense bill set for a House vote later this week.

On Saturday, Hegseth discussed the footage during a Fox News interview, indicating that officials are reviewing it but did not commit to public release. He emphasized, “Whatever we were to decide to release, we’d have to be very responsible about it.”

On Capitol Hill, bipartisan tensions are rising over the legality of the second strike, with members of the Senate Intelligence Committee expressing differing views. Sen. Tom Cotton, the Republican chair, stated he would not oppose the footage’s public release, claiming it was “not gruesome” and similar to other military strikes seen in the past. In contrast, Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, described the video as “profoundly shaking” and expressed concerns over the military’s decision to target survivors.

Both Himes and Rep. Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, have seen the footage and raised alarms about the implications of striking survivors at sea. Legal experts warn that such actions could violate military warfare laws.

With mounting pressure from lawmakers and the public, the fate of the footage hangs in the balance. The Pentagon has yet to respond to requests for comment regarding the ongoing review or the potential release timeline. As this story develops, the implications of military operations against drug cartels are poised to become a pivotal issue in upcoming discussions in Congress.

Stay tuned for updates as this urgent situation unfolds. The ramifications of these military actions could have a lasting impact on U.S. drug policy and military engagement in the region.

Editorial
Written By
Editorial

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.