Ghislaine Maxwell Claims No Epstein Client List in DOJ Interview

URGENT UPDATE: In a controversial interview with the U.S. Department of Justice, Ghislaine Maxwell has declared that there is no incriminating client list related to Jeffrey Epstein, nor any evidence of a blackmail scheme involving high-profile associates. This shocking revelation comes from a transcript released by the DOJ detailing a two-day interrogation last month in Tallahassee, Florida.
Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for her role in Epstein’s sex trafficking operation, told Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche that during her time with Epstein from the early 1990s to the mid-2000s, she never witnessed any illicit acts involving prominent figures like former Presidents Bill Clinton and Donald Trump. “There is no list,” Maxwell asserted. “I never saw that, I never imagined it.”
This interview is critical as it coincides with a broader investigation into Epstein’s extensive network. Federal prosecutors have indicated that their review of the case revealed no evidence that could lead to new charges against third parties. The DOJ’s decision not to release its files on Epstein has triggered outrage among victims and advocates, who fear a potential cover-up.
Maxwell’s claims have drawn immediate backlash. Annie Farmer, a key witness in Maxwell’s trial, expressed her dismay, stating that victims “unequivocally object to any potential leniency” for Maxwell. This underscores the emotional toll this case continues to exert on survivors.
During her questioning, Maxwell maintained that she was unfairly portrayed and insisted she was not involved in the exploitation of minors. “I did introduce him to women… but not underage women,” she stated, emphasizing her ignorance of any criminal activities involving Epstein. Her comments raise questions about the integrity of the justice system that convicted her despite her claims of innocence.
The DOJ granted Maxwell limited immunity for her interview, meaning her statements could not be used against her unless she lied. This arrangement has drawn scrutiny, especially given that Blanche had previously defended Trump, raising concerns about conflicts of interest and motivations behind the inquiry.
During the interrogations, Maxwell was asked about numerous influential figures, including tech billionaires Bill Gates and Elon Musk, as well as celebrities like Kevin Spacey. In every instance, Maxwell insisted she had no knowledge of wrongdoing. “A man wants sexual favors, he will find that,” she claimed, dismissing the existence of any “deep state” conspiracy to protect elite participants in Epstein’s crimes.
This meeting, which lasted for over nine hours across two days, was initiated by Maxwell’s legal team. Her attorney, David Markus, stated that she was asked about over one hundred individuals associated with Epstein. The tone was reportedly cordial, allowing Maxwell to critique her accusers freely.
In a striking moment, Maxwell compared the investigation into Epstein’s associates to a “Salem witch trial,” suggesting that the narrative surrounding Epstein has spiraled out of control. “It’s bananas,” she said, underscoring the sensational nature of the allegations against her and others.
As Maxwell continues to seek a review of her conviction by the U.S. Supreme Court, her legal team has not yet approached Trump for a potential pardon, but they have indicated she would welcome any form of relief. The political implications of her statements could have far-reaching consequences as the DOJ navigates public outrage and political pressure.
The developments from this interview are still unfolding, and the DOJ is expected to continue its review of Epstein’s complex web of connections. Advocates for victims of sexual abuse are watching closely, concerned that any leniency shown to Maxwell could undermine justice for those affected by Epstein’s crimes.
As the story evolves, the public is urged to stay informed about potential changes in the legal landscape surrounding Epstein and Maxwell, as well as the ongoing pursuit of accountability for all involved.