Technology

Major Changes Threaten the Future of the Open Internet

Major Changes Threaten the Future of the Open Internet
Editorial
  • PublishedAugust 14, 2025

Recent developments in the online landscape signal significant changes to the principles that have governed the Internet. Two major events this week highlight a shift that could dismantle the concept of an open internet. First, **Reddit** announced a substantial policy change that restricts access to its data, while the **United Kingdom**’s **Online Safety Act** imposes stringent regulations on user-generated content, raising concerns about digital freedom.

**Reddit’s New Restrictions**

On March 4, 2024, Reddit revealed it is blocking the **Internet Archive** from caching most of its new webpages indefinitely. This decision, reported by **The Verge**, comes in response to artificial intelligence firms scraping Reddit’s vast forum ecosystem to train their bots. A spokesperson for Reddit explained, “Internet Archive provides a service to the open web, but we’ve been made aware of instances where AI companies violate platform policies, including ours, and scrape data from the Wayback Machine.”

This policy change means that only daily homepages listing popular discussions will be archivable, limiting the preservation of Reddit’s rich digital history, which includes notable events and cultural moments. Users responded with frustration, directing their ire at CEO **Steve Huffman**.

**Impact of the Online Safety Act**

Simultaneously, the **UK’s Online Safety Act** has come into effect, mandating that platforms hosting user-generated content implement robust age-screening tools. These regulations aim to protect underage users from harmful material but have raised alarms about their impact on creative freedom. Websites now face the requirement to appoint a senior representative to report compliance efforts to **Ofcom**, the UK’s communications regulator.

Reddit has been forced to compromise its commitment to user anonymity for its UK users, who must upload biometric data or government identification to access certain subreddits. While these measures are intended to shield the platform from potential violations, they disproportionately affect smaller communities and non-profit sites, such as **Wikipedia**.

The Wikimedia Foundation filed a legal challenge against being classified as a “Category 1” platform, which would subject it to the most stringent demands of the Online Safety Act. The foundation argues that such classification could endanger volunteer privacy and disrupt Wikipedia’s operations in the UK. A recent ruling by London’s High Court of Justice rejected the lawsuit, emphasizing the importance of free expression but noted the need for Ofcom to avoid imposing burdensome regulations on the platform.

**Consequences for Smaller Platforms**

The implications of these developments extend beyond Reddit and Wikipedia. Smaller platforms and forums have already begun to shut down, struggling to comply with the new regulations. Users seeking information on niche topics, such as parenting or hobbies, may find their preferred spaces disappearing. This trend has led to a significant uptick in the use of virtual private networks (VPNs) in the UK as users seek to bypass stringent regulations.

In the United States, similar legislation is emerging. States like **Texas**, **Utah**, **Louisiana**, and **Arkansas** have enacted laws requiring age verification for certain websites, which a recent Supreme Court ruling upheld. The **TAKE IT DOWN Act**, signed into law by former President **Donald Trump**, further complicates the landscape by requiring social media platforms to develop content removal systems that echo the UK’s regulations, potentially chilling free expression among creators.

**Future of the Internet at Stake**

The erosion of the open internet is becoming evident as a result of these changes. The restrictions imposed by Reddit and the regulatory pressures stemming from the Online Safety Act reflect a growing movement towards tighter control over online spaces. Users are increasingly concerned about the future of digital communication and the preservation of online communities.

With over **500,000 signatures** on a government petition in the UK calling for the repeal of the Online Safety Act, there is clear public discontent. The growing backlash against these measures underscores the urgent need for a balanced approach to online safety that does not compromise the foundational principles of free expression and access to information.

As the digital landscape evolves, the open internet faces unprecedented challenges. The actions taken by major platforms and governments around the world will shape the future of online communication, and the consequences are likely to be felt for years to come.

Editorial
Written By
Editorial

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.