Oakley Council to Vote on Censure of George Fuller Amid Bullying Claims
The Oakley City Council is scheduled to vote on a resolution to censure Councilmember George Fuller in response to allegations of bullying and retaliatory behavior toward city staff. This decision follows an independent third-party investigation that reportedly substantiated claims against Fuller, who has served on the council since his election in 2020.
Details of the Censure Motion
The censure motion, proposed by Mayor Shannon Shaw, is set to be discussed during a council meeting on October 3, 2023. Shaw emphasized that the resolution aims to uphold the integrity of the city and restore public trust. He stated, “The only reason this is coming about is specifically because of his actions toward staff.” Shaw further indicated that the council must hold itself accountable for its conduct.
Fuller, who represents District 5, which includes areas such as Creekside Park and Riata Park, has faced scrutiny for his behavior toward not only staff but also fellow councilmembers and constituents. His term is set to expire in November 2028.
Investigation Findings and Council’s Authority
The independent investigation into Fuller’s conduct revealed that he engaged in actions inconsistent with the duties of an elected official. A staff report noted that such behavior undermines staff performance and erodes public trust in the City Council. Although details of the investigation remain confidential, the report confirmed findings of bullying and retaliatory conduct.
According to Oakley City Attorney Derek Cole, a censure serves as a political statement from the council rather than a legal action. He clarified that city administration and staff do not take a position on the matter. “City administration and staff have not nor will not take any position on the proposed censure,” Cole stated.
While the council lacks the authority to remove an elected official without a criminal conviction, it can express disapproval through a censure. The resolution also encourages Fuller to participate in professional development related to workplace harassment prevention and ethics.
In anticipation of the vote, Fuller referred requests for comment to his attorney, who had not responded by the time of publication. During the council meeting, Fuller will have the opportunity to present his defense against the proposed censure, followed by a public comment period.
The outcome of this vote may have significant implications for the future dynamics of the Oakley City Council and its relationship with city staff, as it seeks to address issues of workplace conduct and public accountability.
