Maxine Waters Advocates for 25th Amendment Amid Fed Controversy
Representative Maxine Waters has called for the invocation of the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, arguing that President Donald Trump is unfit for office. Her remarks came during a discussion regarding Trump’s recent removal of Lisa Cook from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve on August 29, 2025. Waters asserted that this action warrants serious consideration of the president’s mental fitness and poses a significant threat to American democracy.
During her appearance on MSNBC’s “The Weeknight,” Waters emphasized the urgency of evaluating Trump’s capabilities as president. “It is time to call for Article 25 of the Constitution to determine his unfitness,” she stated. Waters condemned the president’s decision to remove Cook, claiming it could destabilize the economy and affect essential financial decisions.
Trump’s removal of Cook was based on allegations that she misrepresented mortgage information. Waters expressed concern that this action could “upend the entire economy” and disrupt Wall Street operations. She urged for a robust response to what she described as one of the most destructive actions by the president.
Legal Challenges and Political Fallout
Cook has taken legal action against Trump, filing a lawsuit that argues the president did not meet the legal standards for her removal. She is seeking a restraining order to allow her to remain on the Federal Reserve Board. Legal experts suggest that this case may escalate to the Supreme Court, marking a significant confrontation between the White House and the Federal Reserve.
In the same discussion, Representative Debbie Wasserman Schultz expressed her surprise at Waters’ call for the 25th Amendment, noting that previous presidents have faced impeachment for lesser actions. She suggested that Trump’s true intention may be to remove Jerome Powell, the chair of the Federal Reserve, and that his current actions represent a calculated effort to exert influence over the institution.
Wasserman Schultz criticized the grounds for Cook’s removal, stating that the accusations against her lack substantial evidence. She pointed out that Cook did not receive preferential interest rates on mortgages, which undermines the claims of misconduct.
Broader Implications for U.S. Monetary Policy
The controversy surrounding Cook’s removal has raised alarms about the potential ramifications for U.S. monetary policy. Trump’s actions may provide him with greater control over the Federal Reserve, which is crucial in shaping economic strategies and interest rates. Waters highlighted the need for vigilance and decisive action in response to the president’s maneuvers, urging Congress to approach the situation with seriousness.
The White House has yet to issue a formal response to the ongoing legal challenges and political discussions surrounding this issue. As the situation develops, the implications for both the Federal Reserve and the broader economy remain a focal point for lawmakers and citizens alike.
The unfolding events have not only intensified scrutiny on Trump’s presidency but have also reignited debates around the mechanisms available for addressing perceived presidential unfitness. Waters’ call for the 25th Amendment reflects a growing concern among some lawmakers regarding the president’s decision-making capabilities and the potential impact on the nation’s democratic institutions.
