Entertainment

Review: ‘Wicked: For Good’ Struggles to Capture Magic of Oz

Review: ‘Wicked: For Good’ Struggles to Capture Magic of Oz
Editorial
  • PublishedDecember 31, 2025

The highly anticipated sequel, Wicked: For Good, is now available on Video on Demand platforms, including Amazon Prime Video. While it follows the success of the first film, which grossed over $750 million worldwide, this installment may not reach similar heights, potentially earning less than $500 million. Critics are noting that the sequel’s appeal might depend on viewers’ tolerance for significant alterations to the beloved 1939 classic, The Wizard of Oz.

The narrative resumes where the previous film left off, adhering to the original Broadway musical’s two-act structure. However, the runtime has expanded to almost five hours across both films, raising concerns about pacing and engagement. Critics have pointed out that the second act feels notably weaker, lacking memorable songs and relying heavily on the inclusion of familiar characters from the original story.

Plot and Character Dynamics

The story explores the political machinations within the land of Oz, depicting the Wizard, played by Jeff Goldblum, as a tyrannical figure. The plot involves themes of oppression as the Wizard maintains control over sentient Animals, represented through characters like Cynthia Erivo‘s Elphaba, who becomes the scapegoat for the realm’s misfortunes. Meanwhile, Ariana Grande‘s Glinda represents the complicity of privilege, as she enjoys a life of comfort while blind to the injustices around her.

As the film progresses, character motivations often appear muddled. Glinda’s acceptance of the Wizard’s regime for personal gain contrasts sharply with Elphaba’s struggles for Animal rights. Their strained friendship serves as a central theme, but the execution has drawn criticism for lacking depth and clarity.

The introduction of new subplots, such as Elphaba’s half-sister, Nessarose, who enacts a travel ban in Munchkinland, seems unnecessary and detracts from the main narrative. Critics argue that these diversions dilute the urgency of Elphaba’s conflict with the Wizard and the overarching themes of revolution and resistance.

Performance and Direction

Despite the film’s shortcomings, the performances of the leading actors are noteworthy. Cynthia Erivo delivers an earnest portrayal of Elphaba, while Ariana Grande showcases her vocal talents as Glinda. Michelle Yeoh‘s role as Miss Morrible adds a layer of complexity, yet some critics lament that her character is underutilized.

Director Jon M. Chu captures moments of brilliance, particularly in musical sequences like “The Girl in the Bubble.” He employs creative cinematography, although some critics feel that the film often resorts to flashy techniques to mask its narrative weaknesses. The overall visual experience has been described as inconsistent, with some sequences appearing muddled rather than engaging.

While the film attempts to tackle themes of morality and the nuanced definitions of “good” and “wicked,” the execution has been criticized for being overly simplistic. The film’s reliance on familiar symbols from the original Wizard of Oz may alienate viewers seeking originality.

In conclusion, Wicked: For Good presents an ambitious narrative that struggles to balance its political commentary with character development. While it may find an audience among die-hard fans, many critics recommend skipping this sequel in favor of the original classic. The film’s lack of cohesiveness and clarity ultimately undermines its potential impact.

Editorial
Written By
Editorial

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.