Jury Awards $1.7M to N.J. Housing Workers in Fraud Whistleblower Case
UPDATE: A federal jury has just awarded $1.7 million to two former employees of the Camden Housing Authority in a groundbreaking ruling that confirms their wrongful termination for exposing alleged fraud within the agency. This urgent verdict was reached on November 18, 2024, highlighting the significant repercussions of retaliation against whistleblowers.
Gary Evangelista, the agency’s former director of security, and Kaberia Fussell, a housing specialist, were dismissed on December 19, 2018, after raising serious concerns about issues including unpaid rent, misuse of housing units, and potential theft. Rather than addressing these allegations, the Camden Housing Authority opted to terminate their employment, according to the lawsuit.
In a significant legal battle that began when both employees filed a whistleblower suit in 2020, the U.S. District Court ruled against the agency’s attempt to dismiss the case. The jury ultimately found that their terminations were indeed retaliatory, violating their rights under the First Amendment by punishing them for their protected speech and union activities.
The jury awarded Evangelista $510,891 for lost earnings, $750,000 for compensatory damages, and $2,500 in punitive damages. Fussell was granted $450,000 in compensatory damages and $2,500 for punitive damages. This landmark decision not only compensates the workers but also serves as a crucial reminder of the protections afforded to whistleblowers in the workplace.
Fussell, who successfully appealed her termination and has since returned to work, expressed her relief and gratitude, stating that the verdict provided “long-awaited vindication” for her and Evangelista. Evangelista, who faced significant challenges securing steady employment after his dismissal, described the ruling as a turning point, saying it is “giving me my life back after six years.”
This case emphasizes the critical importance of protecting whistleblowers who risk their jobs to report misconduct. As these revelations unfold, it is essential for organizations to foster an environment where employees feel safe to voice concerns without fear of retaliation.
As the implications of this verdict resonate, all eyes are on the Camden Housing Authority and the potential changes to its policies regarding employee protections and accountability. The verdict is a pivotal moment for whistleblower advocacy and sets a precedent for similar cases in the future.
Stay tuned for more updates as this story develops.
