California Governor Vetoes Bill to Ban Harmful Cookware Chemicals
Governor Gavin Newsom of California has vetoed a bill aimed at phasing out harmful “forever chemicals,” known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), used in nonstick cookware. The decision, announced on October 16, 2023, is seen as a significant win for the cookware industry and notable chefs who argue that nonstick pans are safe when used properly. Celebrity chefs like Rachael Ray, David Chang, and Marcus Samuelsson were vocal opponents of the legislation, emphasizing the importance of affordable kitchen products.
PFAS chemicals, commonly used to coat nonstick cookware, are also found in a wide range of consumer goods, including waterproof clothing, stain-resistant carpets, dental floss, and firefighting foams. These synthetic substances are notorious for their persistence in the environment and the human body, having been linked to various health issues such as low birth weights, developmental delays in children, and increased risks of certain cancers, including prostate, kidney, and testicular cancer. The term “forever chemicals” reflects their inability to decompose over time, raising concerns about their long-term impact on health and the environment.
The vetoed bill would have phased out PFAS in six categories of products, including cookware, food packaging, dental floss, cleaning products, ski wax, and children’s items like cribs and strollers. In his announcement, Newsom expressed his support for the bill’s objectives but voiced concerns regarding the potential increase in costs for consumers. He stated, “I am deeply concerned about the impact this bill would have on the availability of affordable options in cooking products.” He urged supporters of the bill to continue discussions that balance health protections with economic accessibility.
The Cookware Sustainability Alliance, representing manufacturers, praised Newsom for recognizing the financial strain the bill could impose on working Californians. President Steve Burns commented on the potential economic hardships that could have resulted from the legislation.
In contrast, environmental advocates criticized the veto. Anna Reade, director of PFAS advocacy at the Natural Resources Defense Council, stated, “Gov. Newsom failed to protect Californians and our drinking water from toxic ‘forever chemicals.’” Reade highlighted that several other states have already enacted laws to phase out PFAS, suggesting California is lagging in environmental protection measures.
State Senator Ben Allen of Santa Monica, who sponsored the bill, expressed disappointment over the veto. He argued that Californians would ultimately bear the financial burden of cleaning up PFAS from water systems. Allen pointed out that safer alternatives, such as cast iron or carbon steel cookware, are readily available at reasonable prices. He remarked, “While the manufacturers escape accountability, ratepayers and local governments have been struggling to keep up with the ballooning costs of cleaning these ‘forever chemicals’ from our water infrastructure.”
The public discourse surrounding the bill gained traction due to the involvement of well-known chefs, each with their own cookware lines. In a previous communication, Rachael Ray emphasized the necessity of nonstick pots and pans for home cooks, noting their durability and affordability.
As the debate continues, the implications of Newsom’s veto remain significant. While the decision aims to protect consumer costs, it raises critical questions about the balance between economic considerations and public health safety in California.
