Washington AG Task Force Faces Confusion Over Domestic Extremism

UPDATE: The Washington State Attorney General’s Office Domestic Extremism and Mass Violence Task Force is grappling with controversy over its ability to define **domestic violent extremism (DVE)**. During a critical meeting on **September 26, 2023**, task force member and Walla Walla County Sheriff **Mark Crider** declared, “There’s no way we can define domestic extremism,” highlighting the complexities of legally protected speech and actions.

WHY THIS MATTERS NOW: As the task force prepares to submit its final report to the governor and state legislature by **December 1, 2026**, clarity on DVE is imperative. Crider emphasized that attempting to define extremism risks “setting us up for failure,” as policing thoughts rather than actions could lead to misinterpretation and ineffective measures.

In a meeting that veered into heated discussions, the task force debated whether law enforcement, particularly **U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)** agents, should be allowed to wear masks for identity protection amid increasing threats. The meeting coincided with a violent anti-ICE protest in **Illinois**, where demonstrators shouted “Shoot ICE!” illustrating the heightened tensions surrounding immigration enforcement.

CRITICAL QUOTES: Researcher **Cynthia Miller-Idriss** from the Polarization & Extremism Research & Innovation Lab raised alarms over vigilantism, cautioning that revealing identities risks the safety of not just agents, but their families and children. She stated, “It puts children at risk, it puts family members at risk.”

**Mary McCord** from the Institution for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection countered the idea of masked officials, suggesting, “It’s a terrible practice for public officials.” This debate highlights the ongoing struggle to balance public safety and constitutional rights.

Adding to the tension, **Rep. Jim Walsh**, R-Aberdeen, criticized the task force’s efforts as a “scam” and an embarrassment to taxpayers, calling for a reevaluation of the funds allocated to the initiative. His comments reflect a growing frustration among some lawmakers about the task force’s direction.

WHAT TO EXPECT NEXT: The task force plans to reconvene on **January 9, 2024**, as it continues to navigate these complex issues. The focus remains on developing a framework that effectively addresses DVE while respecting individual rights.

As the situation unfolds, the implications for law enforcement practices and civil liberties remain critical. Keep an eye on developments as the task force strives to clarify its objectives and recommendations in the coming months.

This ongoing debate encapsulates the urgency and complexity surrounding domestic extremism in the U.S., making it a topic of significant national interest.