Oregon Sues Trump Administration Over National Guard Deployment
URGENT UPDATE: Oregon officials have just announced a lawsuit aimed at blocking the Trump administration’s deployment of the National Guard in Portland. This legal action comes mere hours after the Defense Department confirmed that 200 members of the Oregon National Guard would be federalized for a 60-day mission to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel and federal facilities.
The lawsuit was filed in federal court on Sunday evening, claiming the deployment is not only unnecessary but could escalate existing tensions in the city. Officials argue that the Trump administration’s actions are “provocative and arbitrary,” potentially inciting public unrest rather than promoting safety.
In a statement, Governor Tina Kotek emphasized, “There is no insurrection, there is no threat to national security and there is no need for military troops in our major cities.” She condemned the federal military presence, stating, “Oregon is our home. It is not a military target.”
The Defense Department communicated its plans to state leaders earlier on Sunday, citing the need to protect federal assets amid ongoing protests. However, the lawsuit highlights that these protests have been relatively small, often involving fewer than 30 people.
This federal intervention is viewed by Oregon officials as an overreach of power, violating the 10th Amendment which reserves police powers for the states. The legal filing indicates that the deployment could lead to “predictable consequences” requiring local law enforcement to respond to escalated tensions.
In a press conference, Kotek reiterated her stance against the deployment, calling it an “abuse of power” and a “misuse of federal troops.” The lawsuit names President Donald Trump, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem as defendants, accusing them of political retribution against a specific jurisdiction.
In response, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson defended the President’s actions, stating he is using his lawful authority to safeguard federal personnel in Portland following months of unrest. She stated that federal officers have faced assaults and threats from protestors.
As this story develops, Oregon’s legal team is preparing for a rapid response in court, seeking an immediate injunction against the deployment. The outcome of this lawsuit could have significant implications for state versus federal authority, particularly in the context of law enforcement and public safety.
Residents of Portland and the wider Oregon area are urged to stay informed as this situation unfolds, with potential implications for civil liberties and the balance of power between state and federal governments. Stay tuned for further updates as this critical legal battle progresses.
